by Purifier » Fri Nov 16, 2012 4:13 pm
In my opinion the increase should be either the same or higher to be logical.
2 persons know more (usualy :p) then 1 person, 3 know more then 2.
So compared to having for example 2 researches working out a new tech, the change of 4 researches working it out faster/sooner is at least equel and mostly higher, certainly not lower.
Take a look at the last 100 years of human development, inventions and discoveries. The time it took for something new to be researched became less over that 100 year period (or take another number it doesnt realy matter). This is ofcourse because of development but mainly because more people in the world became scientists in 1 field or another.
1 man (William Gilbert) started (as far as records show) to study electricity, look how many uses for it have been invented (in shorter times everytime) because more and more people after William Gilbert did research in that field ?
In my opinion the increase should be either the same or higher to be logical.
2 persons know more (usualy :p) then 1 person, 3 know more then 2.
So compared to having for example 2 researches working out a new tech, the change of 4 researches working it out faster/sooner is at least equel and mostly higher, certainly not lower.
Take a look at the last 100 years of human development, inventions and discoveries. The time it took for something new to be researched became less over that 100 year period (or take another number it doesnt realy matter). This is ofcourse because of development but mainly because more people in the world became scientists in 1 field or another.
1 man (William Gilbert) started (as far as records show) to study electricity, look how many uses for it have been invented (in shorter times everytime) because more and more people after William Gilbert did research in that field ?