by Farwest » Sat Mar 02, 2013 4:37 pm
Esoteric Rogue wrote:Farwest wrote:Can you put a feature to Enable/Disable to limit technology to 100 or unlimited ?
Well, researching to 100 takes 9 units less than 4 years. That would be awfully quick.
But that is not the issue. If you are competing with other companies on the same product with innovation, that is totally meaningless.
Think about Samsung and Apple example. Both companies are making R&D to gain the upper hand, and if we consider these two company in CapLab, then after some time they couldn't achieve more technology but should only cut costs to gain the upper hand; if a third company just wants to start to innovate the product to that level, they can do. But in real life, it is impossible now to reach that R&D level for companies in a short time to enter a serious competition. But here, it is possible. (so unrealistic)
So, if researching to 100 takes 9 units less than 4 years, that would be meaningless against that kind of competition.
But I agree with this point of yours:
Esoteric Rogue wrote:Also, if you want to max out so that you can find other ways to cut costs to sell your products
And that makes meaningful to use limit of 100, for just focusing on to cutting costs, and learning ways of that kind of competition.
But if I want to erase other competitors with the continous advancement of technology, the limit of 100 makes it impossible. I can still find way for cutting costs even, as we mentioned for enabling the limit.
Esoteric Rogue wrote:As a side note, I found it impossible to be an R&D exclusive company. Not even close to feasible.
We can do, I am trying to do, especially it is costly in the first 5 years. Just selling/collaborating technology part or venture capital part is missing in CapLab.
[quote="Esoteric Rogue"][quote="Farwest"]Can you put a feature to Enable/Disable to limit technology to 100 or unlimited ?[/quote]
Well, researching to 100 takes 9 units less than 4 years. That would be awfully quick.[/quote]
But that is not the issue. If you are competing with other companies on the same product with innovation, that is totally meaningless.
Think about Samsung and Apple example. Both companies are making R&D to gain the upper hand, and if we consider these two company in CapLab, then after some time they couldn't achieve more technology but should only cut costs to gain the upper hand; if a third company just wants to start to innovate the product to that level, they can do. But in real life, it is impossible now to reach that R&D level for companies in a short time to enter a serious competition. But here, it is possible. (so unrealistic)
So, if researching to 100 takes 9 units less than 4 years, that would be meaningless against that kind of competition.
But I agree with this point of yours:
[quote="Esoteric Rogue"]Also, if you want to max out so that you can find other ways to cut costs to sell your products[/quote]
And that makes meaningful to use limit of 100, for just focusing on to cutting costs, and learning ways of that kind of competition.
But if I want to erase other competitors with the continous advancement of technology, the limit of 100 makes it impossible. I can still find way for cutting costs even, as we mentioned for enabling the limit.
[quote="Esoteric Rogue"]As a side note, I found it impossible to be an R&D exclusive company. Not even close to feasible.[/quote]
We can do, I am trying to do, especially it is costly in the first 5 years. Just selling/collaborating technology part or venture capital part is missing in CapLab.