by Stylesjl » Wed Jan 29, 2025 8:58 pm
Yes, it is intentional that you can own 0% of your company and still be CEO (this is also true of real life). You only get kicked out when someone else owns 50%+ of the company.
In terms of buying your own shares back - this is also the correct behaviour. If you own 0% of shares then why would a share buyback increase your ownership? You have to own some shares in the first place to benefit from it. A share buyback simply decreases the number of shares that can be sold to the public (or takes the shares off someone else, making your existing stake bigger).
Yes, it is intentional that you can own 0% of your company and still be CEO (this is also true of real life). You only get kicked out when someone else owns 50%+ of the company.
In terms of buying your own shares back - this is also the correct behaviour. If you own 0% of shares then why would a share buyback increase your ownership? You have to own some shares in the first place to benefit from it. A share buyback simply decreases the number of shares that can be sold to the public (or takes the shares off someone else, making your existing stake bigger).