Page 1 of 1

Playing for more than and 100 years, found some unreasonable

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:54 am
by chenglui520
first, Thank you so much, this is a great piece of work.


1.即使在初始化游戏的时候设置了极少的启动资金,但在游戏一开局还是能有很强购买力.(比如一次性买7栋商业写字楼)
2.从游戏一开局起,商业写字楼,和居民楼就非常容易赚钱,只需要要购买地产就能非常轻松成为市值第一的公司,并且贯穿整个游戏始终.
3.在AI控制的政府模式,即使在政府非常有钱与月盈利非常可观的情况下,也没有意愿去投资城市,降低利率改善投资环境等,债券几乎永不需要发行.
4.如果我无限的去发行债券导致城市最终破产,然后会出现城市陷入无限循环破产(央行刚增发了钱弥补破产,但是高额的利息马上又把城市压垮)
4.随着城市的慢慢发展,AI变得越来越难盈利了,并且也没有意愿去开新的投资去扩大生产规模.最终导致AI相继被兼并,或者破产.然后新的AI并没有开公司的意愿,存档里玩到100年后只剩下12家公司竞争,我相信继续玩下去会剩下得更少.
5.虽然房地产的需求从游戏一开始就很旺盛,并且很廉价.但是AI控制的政府与上市公司几乎完全没有意愿投资地产行业,这导致玩家只要涉足地产就可以市值第一了.
6.我盈余了大量的钱去投资AI的执政党,发现他们基本花不光.钱花的少了,自然竞选不上. 但是明明他们有很多捐款也花销这么少.
8.新建设的城市,比如深圳,被我玩成了奇葩,在交给了AI的市长来治理城市后,后来变得越来越诡异.

存档文件: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/102 ... EN_006.SAV

Re: Playing for more than and 100 years, found some unreason

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 7:42 am
by eleaza
I am curious if we write in English in relies will you understand what wer are saying? Since translating all of your opinions would probably take a long time. And I will be quit busy these couple of weeks.

Re: Playing for more than and 100 years, found some unreason

Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2016 6:27 am
by David
You may try the survival mode, which is more challenging.