by counting » Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:01 pm
I was able to create all 8 possible truth table scenarios, and glad to report that they checked out.
But there are something interesting I discovered. Like in condition #1, indeed it requires child's brand rating at least 1 point greater than parent's, if they are equal, parent's brand loyalty, awareness, and rating are retained. Also the second criteria in condition #2 ["The child's brand loyalty is at least 10 points greater than the parent's brand loyalty"] is in fact [child's brand loyalty > parent's brand loyalty + 10], that means if child's brand loyalty is "-1", for this criteria to be true, the parent's brand loyalty has to be "-12" or less. When parent's brand loyalty is "-11" this criteria is still false. (So the sentience to describe this criteria should be more accurate as ["The child's brand loyalty is more than 10 points greater than the parent's brand loyalty"])
I was able to create all 8 possible truth table scenarios, and glad to report that they checked out.
But there are something interesting I discovered. Like in condition #1, indeed it requires child's brand rating at least 1 point greater than parent's, if they are equal, parent's brand loyalty, awareness, and rating are retained. Also the second criteria in condition #2 [[b][i]"The child's brand loyalty is at least 10 points greater than the parent's brand loyalty[/i]"[/b]] is in fact [b][child's brand loyalty > parent's brand loyalty + 10][/b], that means if child's brand loyalty is "-1", for this criteria to be true, the parent's brand loyalty has to be "-12" or less. When parent's brand loyalty is "-11" this criteria is still false. (So the sentience to describe this criteria should be more accurate as [[i][b]"The child's brand loyalty is more than 10 points greater than the parent's brand loyalty"[/b][/i]])